When you go to the voting booth, the choice is easy.
Candidate A= graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1958. He became a naval aviator, flying ground-attack aircraft from aircraft carriers. During the Vietnam War, he nearly lost his life in the 1967 USS Forrestal fire. In October 1967, while on a bombing mission over Hanoi, he was shot down, badly injured, and captured by the North Vietnamese. He was a prisoner of war until 1973, experiencing episodes of torture and refusing an out-of-sequence early repatriation offer; his war wounds left him with lifelong physical limitations.
He retired from the Navy as a captain in 1981, moved to Arizona, and entered politics. Elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1982, he served two terms, and was then elected to the U.S. Senate in 1986, winning re-election easily in 1992, 1998, and 2004. While generally adhering to conservative principles, He at times has had a media reputation as a “maverick” for having disagreed with his party. After being investigated and largely exonerated in a political influence scandal of the 1980s as a member of the “Keating Five,” he made campaign finance reform one of his signature concerns, which eventually led to the passage of the McCain-Feingold Act in 2002. He is also known for his work towards restoring diplomatic relations with Vietnam in the 1990s, and for his belief that the war in Iraq should be fought to a successful conclusion. He has chaired the Senate Commerce Committee, has opposed spending that he considered to be pork barrel, and played a key role in alleviating a crisis over judicial nominations.
Candidate B= says he was born in 1961 in Hawaii, to a white mother from Kansas and a black Muslim father from Kenya who met as students at the University of Hawaii. His place of birth is a matter in dispute, however. As Frank Gaffney reported in The Washington Times on October 14, 2008. When he was six, his mother married an Indonesian oil manager, a “non-practicing Muslim,” and the family moved to Jakarta, where his half-sister was born. The family would reside there for four years. His good friend, the attorney and novelist Scott Turow, wrote that “Candidate B” as a child spent “two years in a Muslim school, then two more in a Catholic school.” School records show that when he attended Catholic school, he was enrolled as a Muslim.
In the Seventies, his family became friendly with Frank Marshall Davis (1905-1987), a black writer and fellow Hawaiian resident. Davis wrote for the Honolulu Record (a Communist newspaper) and was a known member of the Soviet-controlled Communist Party USA (CPUSA). He soon became the young future candidates mentor and advisor. Just prior to heading off to Occidental College (in California) in 1979, he spent some time with “Frank and his old Black Power dashiki self.” he writes that “Frank” told him that college was merely “an advanced degree in compromise,” and cautioned the young future candidate not to “start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that shit.”
This candidate also reveals that during his student years at Columbia he “went to socialist conferences at Cooper Union and African cultural fairs in Brooklyn.” These were Socialist Scholars Conference (SSC) events held at Cooper Union, a privately funded college for the advancement of science and art. SSC events featured the elite of socialist academia as well as union activists, political revolutionaries, reformers, and opponents of “corporate greed.” According to the libertarian writer Trevor Loudon, guest speakers at these conferences included “members of the Communist Party USA and its offshoot, the Committees of Correspondence, as well as Maoists, Trotsyists, black radicals, gay activists and radical feminists.”
Candidate B was trained by the Saul Alinsky-founded Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) in Chicago. (The Developing Communities Project itself was an affiliate of the Gamaliel Foundation, whose modus operandi for the creation of “a more just and democratic society” is rooted firmly in the Alinsky method.) Alinsky was known for helping to establish the aggressive political tactics that characterized the 1960s and have remained central to all subsequent revolutionary movements in the United States.
In the Alinsky model, “organizing” is a euphemism for “revolution” — a wholesale revolution whose ultimate objective is the systematic acquisition of power by a purportedly oppressed segment of the population, and the radical transformation of America’s social and economic structure. The goal is to foment enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos to spark the social upheaval that Marx, Engels, and Lenin predicted — a revolution whose foot soldiers view the status quo as fatally flawed and wholly unworthy of salvation. Thus, the theory goes, the people will settle for nothing less than that status quo’s complete collapse — to be followed by the erection of an entirely new system upon its ruins. Toward that end, they will be apt to follow the lead of charismatic radical organizers who project an aura of confidence and vision, and who profess to clearly understand what types of societal “changes” are needed.
Beginning in the mid-1980s, he worked with ACORN, a creation of the Alinsky network. ACORN was a grassroots political organization that grew out of George Wiley’s National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO), whose members in the late 1960s and early 70s had invaded welfare offices across the U.S. — often violently — bullying social workers and loudly demanding every penny to which the law “entitled” them.
He also worked for Project Vote, the voter-mobilization arm of ACORN. Project Vote’s professed purpose is to carry out “non-partisan” voter-registration drives; to counsel voters on their rights; and to litigate on behalf of voting rights — focusing on the rights of the poor and the “disenfranchised.” He was the attorney for ACORN’s lead election-law cases, and he worked as a trainer at ACORN’s annual conferences, where he taught members of the organization the art of radical community organizing.
In 1988 he applied for admission to Harvard Law School. At the time, a Muslim attorney and black nationalist named Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour asked civil rights activist Percy Sutton to send a letter of recommendation to his (Sutton’s) friends at Harvard on his behalf.
Al-Mansour formerly had been a close personal adviser to Huey Newton and Bobby Seale, having helped them establish the Black Panther Party in the 1960s. He thereafter became an advisor to a number of Saudi billionaires known for funding the spread of Wahhabi extremism in America. Al-Mansour also would show himself to be a passionate hater of the United States, Israel, and white people generally.
In 1993 he took a job as a litigator of voting rights and employment cases with the law firm Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, P.C. (a.k.a. Davis Miner), where he remains a Counsel today. In 1993 he also became a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, another position he still holds.
In 1994 he worked for Davis Miner on a case titled Barnett v. Daley, where he was part of a legal team that challenged the racial makeup of Chicago’s voting districts. His team sought to raise the number of black super-majority districts from 19 to 24. According to the judge in the case, Richard Posner, Candidate A and his fellow litigators held that “no black aldermanic candidate in Chicago has ever beaten a white in a ward that had a black majority of less than 62.6 percent, and it is emphatic that the ward in which the population is 55 percent black is not a black ward — is indeed a white ward, even though only 42 percent of its population is white.”
In a 1995 case known as Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank, Candidate A and his fellow Davis Miner attorneys charged that Citibank was making too few loans to black applicants, and they won the case. Also in 1995, he sued, on behalf of ACORN, for the implementation of the Motor Voter law in Illinois. Jim Edgar, the state’s Republican Governor, opposed the law because he believed that allowing voters to register using only a postcard would breed widespread fraud. ACORN would later invite him to help train its staff. Moreover, he eventually would sit on the Board of the Woods Fund of Chicago, which gave a number of sizable grants to ACORN – including $45,000 in 2000, $75,000 in 2001, and $70,000 in 2002.
In 1995 Candidate A – along with such notables as Al Sharpton and Jeremiah Wright — helped organize the Washington, DC-based Million Man March which featured Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. Said Candidate A in the immediate aftermath of the March:
“What I saw was a powerful demonstration of an impulse and need for African-American men to come together to recognize each other and affirm our rightful place in the society…. Historically, African-Americans have turned inward and towards black nationalism whenever they have a sense, as we do now, that the mainstream has rebuffed us, and that white Americans couldn’t care less about the profound problems African-Americans are facing.”
In the mid-1990s, he developed a friendship with fellow Chicagoans Bill Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn, university professors who hosted meetings at their home to introduce him to their neighbors during his first run for the Illinois state senate in 1996. Ayers (who contributed money to his 1996 campaign) and Dohrn had been leaders of the 1960s domestic terrorist group Weatherman, a Communist-driven splinter faction of Students for a Democratic Society. The pair had participated personally in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, the Capitol building in 1971, and the Pentagon in 1972. To this day, both have remained unrepentant about their former terrorist activities and their hatred of the United States.
In 1995 he sought the endorsement of the so-called New Party for his 1996 state senate run. He was successful in obtaining that endorsement, and he used a number of New Party volunteers as campaign workers. By 1996, he had become a member of the New Party.
Co-founded in 1992 by Daniel Cantor (a former staffer for Jesse Jackson’s 1988 presidential campaign) and Joel Rogers (a sociology and law professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison), the New Party was a Marxist political coalition whose objective was to endorse and elect leftist public officials – most often Democrats. The New Party’s short-term objective was to move the Democratic Party leftward, thereby setting the stage for the eventual rise of new Marxist third party.
Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America and the militant organization ACORN. The party’s Chicago chapter also included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members.
So the choice is simple this November, Vote Candidate A or Candidate B
Your position would be much stronger [if not believable] if you had bothered checking your fact and not omitting others opposed to your biased -if not bigoted- opinion. I have neither the time, the inclination, nor the desire to “wash the great unwashed” such as your sorry ass and correct this screed. I will point out the first of many deliberate -at worst- uninformed -at best- comments regarding Obama’s birth certificate … go to ; they have seen and verified its existence and his veracity. I much more respect and value the well-reasoned opinion of Dr. Phil Butler, USNA ‘61 [Google it, if you know how], who also was held y the wayprisoner at the infamous Hanoi Hilton … longer than John by the way … in which his intelligently [as opposed to your screed] elucidated the reasons HE WILL NOT VOTE FOR JOHN MCCAIN ! Add to that the impressive endorsement provided by Colin Powell last Sunday, as well as: Scott McClellen’s, another ultimate bush 2 insider; John McCain’s campaign legal advisor, et al … the rats are jumping the sinking “straight talk express” as its wheels come off. So you continue reading the reverend moon’s “washington times” and watching fox “news’ [the new standard for “inherent contradiction” [jeez, even rupert murdoch is reported to be fed up with bill o’really, hannity & combs, roger ailes, et al … can druggie rush limburger be far behind?
You are about as inconsequential as the rebubbacan party and its puppeteer “the amerikan taliban” fanatic evangelical movement are about to become.
Although McCain is by far the best of the original Republican candidates, his refusal to admit that the invasion of Iraq was a mistake, despite the confirmed “deliberate misrepresentation” of the Bush administration, clearly demonstrates his inferior judgment in matters of national security.
Fuck you. I would vote Barack Obama if I wasn’t portuguese.
By the way, you just don’t fucking like obama cause you’re a fuckin’ retarded racist.
Again, fuck you, whoever you might be, handicaped.
Wow – you are ignorant! I like how you had to note he got a letter of recommendation from a “muslim” lawyer. How retarded are you? I have about 10 letters of rec for professional school and I have no idea what any of their religions are, nor do I care, I care about their PROFESSIONAL OPINION!!! And who the heck cares what religion he is? Muslims have good values too, and don’t give me shit about terrorist muslims, they are extremists, and on the christian side we have plenty of crazy extremists too (opus dei, mormonism, jehovah witnesses) I just want a competent president, I don’t care what their religion is!! Also if you want to talk about values…at least he didn’t openly cheat on his wife, then divorce her and marry a barbie doll a month later!
The mind of the conservative is like the pupil of the eye – the more light you shed on it, the narrower it becomes.
What a burden you must bear. You are not only a conservative, but a whiny one at that.
I’d say this entry does a good job of showing us the new face of racism and religious discrimination for the next era.
What I love is how adeptly you have managed to edit and twist the truth to support your own belief systems. If anyone is smart enough to go to YouTube and watch Obama’s speeches in their entirety, without bias, and really LISTEN to EVERY WORD he said, it’s evident that Obama is nowhere near the radical extremist or Islamic Terrorist Threat you’d like to imagine him to be.
The fact that this portrays mcain’s right to the office of president merely because he was a war hero in another failed US War in obscene. Not only is this article extremely racist but shows huge discrimination to religion. Every religion has its downfall and i am in the opinion that a country which has no identity of its own (despite the native Americans) shouldn’t hold bias towards any religion, especially in this day and age. Obama is a superior candidate and see’s the bigger picture rather than the narrow mindedness of having to win a war, that: a)shouldn’t of been initiated to begin with b) was deemed illegal by NATO and c) That the US and British armed forces have no right entering in the first place. Article is bias, racist and mal-informed. The right man won on November 4th, and will succeed far more than his predecessor and his opponent in the election. My only fear is for people such as the person that wrote this article, that will be stuck in there own acute world, where they believe the world was formed in 1776, and that God created all things great and beautiful. They forget America was a dream for the people of the western world for a new beginning, the land of the free, and its sad that this concept has lost its meaning over time.
Rubbish article
June 12, 2009
THE MOMENT OF TRUTH
NO RHETORIC-NIX APPEASEMENT
After conquering Germany, Italy and Japan “without appeasement” do we continue to lean into our challenges, or do we cringe and abide with Senator Schumer’s admonition against incurring the wrath of the peso pushers from south of the border?
Now we have déjà vu, a choice:
1. Do we stand strong like men?
2. Do we grovel like mice in the shadows? Cro-Magnon vs. vertebral animal!
A HERO IS SEQUESTERED WITHIN THE LEGIONS OF THE ORDINARY UNTIL IT’S TIME TO STEP UP TO THE PLATE!
SECURE OUR BORDER NOW, NOT TOMORROW, AND STRIVE TO ACCEPT AS VALID, IN SPITE OF YOUR LIBERAL DOCTRINE, THE FACT THAT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS AN AUTHENTIC THREAT TO OUR SECURITY AND PROSPERITY!
P.S. THE VOTING BLOCS WILL SURVIVE!
Armand A. Martineau
WWII Navy Veteran
A tiny voice from the people; you know, your vote-producing constituents?